RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00995
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 16 Mar 11 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The 374 Air Wing Commander (AW/CC) sent out a letter to all installation personel on 21 Mar 2011,
stating that fitness testing was suspended from 11 Mar 2011 until further notice and all members would be exempt.
Additionally, per a staff member of the 374 FSS/FSVS, all FAs that were taken during the fitness testing suspension were removed from AFFMS, except for his.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of Staff Sergeant (E-5).
On 16 Mar 11, the applicant participated in a FA, attaining an overall composite score of 41.60, which constituted an unsatisfactory assessment.
The applicant was credited with the following component scores:
Cardio (walk test) 33/15.50, Abdominal Circumference 39.00/12.60 points, Push-ups 34/7.00 points, Sit-ups 40/6.50 points.
The applicants last 8 FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
26 Apr 13
79.50
Satisfactory
30 Jan 13
33.33
Unsatisfactory
12 Jul 12
79.75
Satisfactory
11 Apr 12
52.30
Unsatisfactory
20
Sep 11
76.20
Satisfactory
22 Jun 11
74.00
Unsatisfactory
*16 Mar 11
41.60
Unsatisfactory
28 Sep 10
77.10
Satisfactory
*Contested FA
______________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial and states, the evidence provided by the applicant does not substantiate his claim. DPSIM states,
the applicant has not provided documentation from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the contested FA.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 18 Oct 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.
Although the applicant contends the 374th Air Wing Commander (AW/CC) suspended all fitness assessments for installation personnel from 11 Mar 2011 until
further notice, he provides no documentation to support his claim. Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00995 in Executive Session on 30 Apr 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Feb 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 23 Sep 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Oct 13.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02087
The V02 in the calculation is 35.807808, when applied to the Alternate Aerobic Test Score Chart in AFI 36-2905, Atch 17, the resulting component score equals a component score of 42.3. Therefore, the AFFMS Fitness Calculator has in fact calculated applicant's score IAW AFI 36-2905. On 2 Nov 13 a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to No evidence of impropriety, V02 calculations IAW AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01944
The updated AFFMS record indicates applicant continued to achieve unsatisfactory scores due to a composite score of 69.5 on both contested FAs. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 13 70.00 Unsatisfactory 29 May 13 81.5 Satisfactory 27 Jul 12 Exempt Exempt *30 May 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board corrected the AFFMS records to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03235
The applicants last 10 FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Push Ups Rating 23 Aug 13 92.63 Exempt Excellent 29 May 13 21.38 Exempt Unsatisfactory 5 Feb 13 84.10 21/6.00 Unsatisfactory 19 Jul 12 79.67 22/6.30 Satisfactory 13 Mar 12 Exempt Exempt Exempt 21 Oct 11 85.00 19/5.50 Satisfactory *6 Sep 11 73.67 18/5.00 Unsatisfactory *20 Jul 11 81.00 16/4.30 Unsatisfactory 5 Nov 10 96.25 Exempt Excellent 14 May 10 75.20 25/8.00 Good *Contested FA On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441
On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicants medical provider. A list of the applicants last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587
In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided. A list of...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02277
On 24 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA and attained a composite score of 64.40 unsatisfactory due to failure to achieve minimum requirements on the AC. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response to the Air Force evaluation, the applicant submitted; a memorandum from the FAC validating that she in fact asked for a re-tape by another...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01550
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01550 XXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 19 Dec 12 and a duplicate FA entry dated 1 Sep 10 be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). He received an AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member's Qualification Status, dated 9...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738
As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...